torecolor.blogg.se

• #Seniority list of irss officers code#

The service with the largest number of officers will form the base.

“This methodology involves interpolation of officers of various services in a combined list, arranged in proportion to total strength of each service. The Debroy Committee suggested two methods for retrospective integration. Therefore, despite retrospective integration being a knotty issue, making posts ex-cadre should be welcomed. Reservation for specific services is inherently inefficient. Posts becoming ex-cadre (no longer reserved for specific services) increases a sense of insecurity, especially because the average entrant through the present civil service examination is older than the average entrant through the present engineering service examination. IRTS, IRAS and IRPS have moved up the most (1987 batch promoted), while IRSME, IRSEE and IRSS have lagged (1985 batch promoted) behind. For instance, consider promotion to the higher administrative grade (HAG). Since posts have historically been reserved for specific services, vertical mobility has been uneven across those eight services. Note that, with decentralisation, the Railway Board has been pruned and if vertical mobility is interpreted as a position in the Rail Bhawan, that opportunity is limited, irrespective of whether the Indian Railway Management System is constituted or not. The knottier problem is that of retrospectively integrating those 8,401 officers into the Indian Railway Management System. “The Railway Board will place an indent on UPSC specifying the number of recruits needed for each discipline such as civil/mechanical/electrical engineers or simple graduates in any subject… After selection of pre-decided numbers from each specialisation/general subjects, they will be merged into a single IRLS (Indian Railway Service) by UPSC itself through a pre-decided formula of inter-se seniority.” This is akin to what happens with the Indian Foreign Service, and there can be a new examination conducted by the UPSC. But in a presentation to the committee, the FROA (Federation of Railway Officers’ Associations) argued for a single service and entry examination, and suggested a method that could be used.

It recommended two distinct services, technical versus non-technical, if there were two separate modes of entry, resulting in a non-homogeneous group of officers. The Debroy Committee found that the reservations of the Gupta-Narain Committee were unwarranted. The Gupta-Narain Committee (1994), set up to examine feasibility of implementing this single service idea, questioned whether this could be done. The Prakash Tandon Committee recommended a single service. Unification has been recommended by several committees - Prakash Tandon Committee (1994), Khanna Committee (1998), Rakesh Mohan Committee (2001), Sam Pitroda Committee (2012) and Bibek Debroy committee (2015).

Departmentalism and functioning in silos are not caused by this alphabet soup of eight services alone, but multiple services certainly contributes. Accordingly, the Final ‘Seniority List’ as on upto 2013 Batch in the grade of DCIT and ACIT grade of 2014 batch of IRS have been finalized and is, hereby circulated for information of all concerned officers.There are 8,401 officers in the Railways, not evenly distributed across the eight services. The representations received have been considered and necessary corrections have been made in the Seniority List. 13678) in the grade of DCIT and ACIT grade of 2014 batch was placed on the official website on 86, respectively for seeking representation(s), if any, from the concerned officers.

#Seniority list of irss officers code#

Sub: – Final Seniority List of IRS officers upto 2013 Batch in the grade of DCIT and ACIT grade of 2014 batch as on -reg.ĭraft Seniority List of IRS Officers upto 2013 Batch (upto Civil Code No. Final Seniority List of IRS Officers upto 2013 batch in the grade of DCIT and ACIT grade of 2014 batch as on – reg.